Level 1 · Reaction
80 %of learners rate the course useful for their daily work.
- End of course
Majlis Academy · Bootcamp · Open now
AI in the engineering delivery lifecycle
Most engineering teams use AI only while they write code. They do not know what each task costs, and they cannot prove that AI-assisted work meets the requirement. In four days, your team learns to use AI from intake to release, at a known cost, with evidence and human approval at each gate.
Aligned with
The questions we answer
#Q1
Answered onDay 1: baseline, token economics, specification
#Q2
Answered onDays 2 and 3: context, traceability, verification agent
#Q3
Answered onDays 3 and 4: approval gates, readiness, governance
01 · The ADLC reference model
The lifecycle your engineers already know, how AI takes part in each stage, and what makes it safe in a regulated institution. Tools and models change every quarter. The model does not.
Delivery
AI execution
Governance
the lifecycle you know, with AI inside it and a gate on each stage
02 · Four days, in lifecycle order
Each day follows the lifecycle: from the baseline on day 1 to governance and adoption on day 4. No course at the Academy runs longer than four days. Two thirds of every day is practice on your own repositories or our synthetic Sandbox Bank.
Map your team's AI use, record the cost of real tasks, and turn prompts into specifications.
→ 3.25 h practice · 1.75 h input
Ground the repository. Decompose a requirement with approval points. Run a plan-then-execute agent flow.
→ 3.5 h practice · 1.5 h input
Trace acceptance criteria to tests. Build a verification agent. Decide go or no-go with evidence.
risk, security and architecture join
→ 3.5 h practice · 1.5 h input
Intake checklist, review agent, a controlled feedback loop and the adoption plan.
risk, security and architecture join
→ 3 h practice · 2 h input
03 · Twelve outcomes
After the course, the learner can do each of these. Every outcome has a graded practice block, and every practice block produces an asset your team keeps.
| # | After the course, the learner can | Level and practice | Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 · Baseline, token economics and specification | |||
| 01 | Map AI use and record a delivery baselineMap your team's AI use onto the ADLC reference model, with the time, quality and cost of three real tasks. | AnalyseArchiMate modelling | 0.75 h |
| 02 | Design a model routing rule setDesign a model routing rule set for five task types and show the change in cost per task against the baseline. | CreateHands-on case | 1.25 h |
| 03 | Rewrite a prompt as a specificationRewrite a prompt from your team as a specification-grade prompt with acceptance criteria, an output contract and a verification check. | ApplyGallery walk | 1.25 h |
| Day 2 · Context, planning and agentic implementation | |||
| 04 | Configure repository contextConfigure the project context of one repository with a rules file and a context-loading pattern that keeps token use within a stated limit. | ApplyHands-on case | 1 h |
| 05 | Decompose a requirement with approval pointsBreak down one requirement into delivery, implementation and verification tasks, and mark the approval point for each task. | AnalyseHands-on case | 1 h |
| 06 | Run a plan-then-execute agent flowRun a plan-then-execute agent flow on a code change with defined stop conditions, escalation points and guardrails. | ApplyBranching case | 1.5 h |
| Day 3 · Verification and production readiness | |||
| 07 | Trace acceptance criteria to testsTrace each acceptance criterion of a requirement to its verification checks, and find the gaps and the noisy tests. | AnalyseHands-on case | 1 h |
| 08 | Build a verification agentBuild a verification agent that checks a pull request against its acceptance criteria and test evidence, and escalates defined cases to a person. | CreateHands-on case | 1.5 h |
| 09 | Assess production readinessAssess an AI-assisted change against a production readiness definition and justify a go or no-go decision with evidence. | EvaluateReview-panel role-play | 1 h |
| Day 4 · Governance, loops and adoption | |||
| 10 | Design an intake checklist and review agentDesign an AI intake checklist and a review agent that classifies each control as pass, fail or escalate. | CreateHands-on case | 1.25 h |
| 11 | Design a controlled feedback loopDesign one feedback loop for a real process with an evaluation signal, a stop condition and a cost boundary. | CreateHands-on case | 1 h |
| 12 | Justify an adoption and ownership planJustify an adoption plan that names the owner, the next step and the sponsor of each artefact that the course produced. | EvaluateWardley mapping | 0.75 h |
04 · What your team keeps
Every outcome produces an asset that your team owns after the course. We build them on your repositories and planning system where your policies allow, or on our synthetic Sandbox Bank.
05 · How we measure success
Kirkpatrick levels 1 to 4. The first two are measured at the end of the course, the last two on your live work afterwards.
Level 1 · Reaction
80 %of learners rate the course useful for their daily work.
Level 2 · Learning
85 %of learners pass the graded work of all twelve outcomes.
Level 3 · Behaviour
2+teams use the routing rules and the verification agent on live work.
Level 4 · Results
Loweraverage cost per task against the day 1 baseline, with review quality held.
Programme targets, not reported results.
06 · Practical details
How Majlis Academy builds courses
Fast on top. Solid underneath.
Backward design from measurable outcomes. Hands-on practice for two thirds of the time. Materials in Simplified Technical English. Assets kept as documentation as code, so the course is rebuilt when the tools change and the core stays.
How the Academy worksPart of Majlis Academy
#1 · Courses
#2 · Advisory
#3 · AI Factories
We advise, we train and we build with you.
Agree the gates once. Then deliver with AI at full speed.
Plan a cohort
Write to us with your sector, the size of your team and the dates you have in mind. We reply with a proposed plan for your environment.